Skip links

Africa: How Fishing Subsidies Hurt the Ocean – And Us, Too

Today, one-third of all fished stocks are exploited at unsustainable levels and another 60 percent are fished to capacity, according to the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization. A significant part of this overfishing is driven by subsidies – most of which go to the owners of large-scale fishing fleets to help pay for fuel, gear, and boat construction.

Ask people what’s most important to them and there’s a good chance they’ll say, “Staying healthy – and keeping my family healthy.” But they might not realize that the health, economic well-being, and safety of their families and communities very much depend on the health of our oceans, which cover 70% of the earth and face threats ranging from warming waters and diminishing fish stocks to plastics pollution and dying reefs. Protecting this ecosystem is critical to human health: The ocean filters our air controls the weather and provides food for billions of people. Yet, collectively, global leaders have not done nearly enough to ensure the long-term sustainability of the marine environment.

Fishing vessels that rely on subsidies to travel farther and longer than might otherwise be profitable are a relentless strain on the ocean. They also hurt the thousands of artisanal (traditional small-scale fishing often for commercial purposes) and subsistence (those who fish just to feed their families) communities around the world that depend on healthy fish populations. Picture the owners of a 50-foot dugout canoe in a West African village. They likely return from their daily forays with fewer and fewer fish if 300-foot, foreign-flagged industrial trawlers are just a few miles offshore, dragging fish nets as wide as a football field.